VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BAKER-KATZ SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR

BAKER-KATZ SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BAKER-KATZ SKILLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION CTR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Haverhill  vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have Haverhill
State attribute explanation MA   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MA
Street 194 BOARDMAN STREET  
Zip Code 1830  
Phone 9783735697  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
77  (31.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
62  (29.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
81 % (2.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/19/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/19/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(4.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
62  (29.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.81  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.55  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/07/2009
date Of Correction: 10/07/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/07/2009
date Of Correction: 10/07/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 08/07/2009
date Of Correction: 10/07/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.3 % (8.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 9.4 / 10.4 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3 % (3.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.5 % (7.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 % (13.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.7 % (6.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.5 % (16.88 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 % (12.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.9 % (6.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3 % (20.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.3 % (6.8 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3 % (5.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.4 % (2.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.9 % (1.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 % (8.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.6 % (37.93 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 % (5.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.3 % (0.46 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7 % (16.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.4 % (21.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved