VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BAKERSFIELD HEALTHCARE CENTER

BAKERSFIELD HEALTHCARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BAKERSFIELD HEALTHCARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BAKERSFIELD   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have BAKERSFIELD
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 730 34TH STREET  
Zip Code 93301  
Phone 6613277687  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
150  (41.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
105  (13.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
70 % (13.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/14/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/16/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
30  (22.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
105  (13.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.39  (0.38 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.21  (0.38 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 07/19/2011
date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/19/2011
date Of Correction: 11/14/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 12/27/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/26/2010
date Of Correction: 12/08/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/05/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 01/20/2012
date Of Correction: 03/25/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 03/04/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 12/14/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 07/14/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 04/03/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 04/03/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 04/03/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 04/02/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 09/02/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 08/26/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Routine And 24-hour Emergency Dental Care For Each Resident.
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 04/01/2009
date Of Correction: 04/20/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 08/26/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Review Or Revise The Resident's Care Plan After Any Major Change In A Resident's Physical Or Mental Health.
survey Date: 08/25/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 08/25/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 03/04/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 10/30/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 08/05/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 04/03/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.9 % (13.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20 % (3.34 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.2 % (10.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.7 % (18.84 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
13.5 % (2.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4 % (10.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.2 % (27.18 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.1 % (42.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.9 % (1.88 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.5 % (4.14 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
78.9 % (5.04 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 % (9.82 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10 % (15.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.9 (64.2) % (3.8 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10 % (0.78 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.6 % (6.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29 % (14.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 12.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4 % (5.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.4 % (19.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.7 % (37.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 % (6.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30.2 % (5.44 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
74 % (7.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.6 % (4.85 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
28.2 % (10.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved