VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BARTOW CENTER

BARTOW CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BARTOW CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BARTOW   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BARTOW
State attribute explanation FL   vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL
Street 2055 E GEORGIA ST  
Zip Code 33830  
Phone 8635330578  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
99  (7.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
83 % (0.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/1/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/29/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 7  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
99  (7.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.32  (0.45 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.93  (0.09 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.25  (0.34 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (5.37 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.12  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Establish And Follow A Written Policy That Permits A Resident To Return To The Nursing Home After Hospitalization.
survey Date: 10/22/2009
date Of Correction: 10/30/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 11/19/2010
date Of Correction: 12/19/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 11/19/2010
date Of Correction: 12/19/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 11/19/2010
date Of Correction: 12/19/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 11/19/2010
date Of Correction: 12/19/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 11/19/2010
date Of Correction: 12/19/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.
survey Date: 11/19/2010
date Of Correction: 12/19/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12 % (13.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7 % (9.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.7 % (10.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9 % (5.93 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.4 % (15.14 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 % (13.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4 % (11.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.4 % (24.98 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
9.1 % (34.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.4 % (7.62 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
70.6 % (14.04 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
70.9 % (13.04 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.2 % (40.7 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 % (13.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.2 % (10.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.8 % (20.9 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10 % (4.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.8 % (7.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.4 % (1.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.7 (90.9) % (10.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 % (8.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1 % (6.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
15.5 % (23.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1 % (9.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.7 % (12.06 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.6 % (7.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
69.1 % (5.65 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.6 % (7.74 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved