BAY POINTE NURSING PAVILION

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	SAINT PETERSBURG	vs	0.2% Nursing Homes USA have SAINT PETERSBURG
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	4201 31ST ST S
Zip Code	33712
Phone	7278671104
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	109 (17.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (109)
Percent of Occupied Beds	91 % (7.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (91) %
Health Survey Date	12/30/2011
Fire Survey Date	12/30/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Corporation	vs	18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation	compare Non profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	26

Staff Information
Number of Residents	109 (17.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.57 (0.2 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.9 (0.06 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.46 (0.13 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (5.39 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (equals average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 12/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Comfortable Sound Levels. survey Date: 12/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Comfortable And Safe Temperature Levels. survey Date: 12/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 12/03/2010 date Of Correction: 12/20/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 05/21/2009 date Of Correction: 06/21/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Hold, Secure And Manage Each Resident's Personal Money Which Is Deposited With The Nursing Home. survey Date: 07/07/2011 date Of Correction: 08/07/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly. survey Date: 06/26/2009 date Of Correction: 07/26/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 08/25/2011 date Of Correction: 09/23/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 08/25/2011 date Of Correction: 09/23/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 07/07/2011 date Of Correction: 08/07/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 07/07/2011 date Of Correction: 08/07/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 07/07/2011 date Of Correction: 08/07/2011
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 04/08/2010 date Of Correction: 05/08/2010
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 01/15/2010 date Of Correction: 01/18/2010
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 08/18/2009 date Of Correction: 09/18/2009
Deficiency #9		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 08/18/2009 date Of Correction: 09/18/2009
Deficiency #10		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 08/18/2009 date Of Correction: 09/18/2009
Deficiency #11		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 08/18/2009 date Of Correction: 09/18/2009
Deficiency #12		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 04/11/2009 date Of Correction: 05/11/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Coordinate Assessments With The Pre-admission Screening And Resident Review Program For Mentally-ill And Mentally-retarded Patients. survey Date: 07/13/2010 date Of Correction: 08/12/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 05/21/2009 date Of Correction: 06/21/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 04/11/2009 date Of Correction: 05/11/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 07/07/2011 date Of Correction: 08/07/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 01/15/2010 date Of Correction: 01/18/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 04/11/2009 date Of Correction: 05/11/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 08/18/2009 date Of Correction: 09/18/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	15.1 % (9.99 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	4.7 % (11.96 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	11.7 % (0.88 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	3.2 % (8.63 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.1 % (11.53 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.3 % (8.16 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.4 % (25.98 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.1 % (41.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.2 % (14.82 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	77.2 % (7.44 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	75.9 % (8.04 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2.1 % (43.8 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.1 % (14.42 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.4 % (8.99 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.4 % (21.3 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	3.1 % (11 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	15.2 % (5.98 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.4 % (3.1 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	25 % (18.38 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5 % (5.65 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	7.5 % (2.08 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.3 % (17.56 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.8 % (35.73 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.4 % (9.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	15.3 % (9.46 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	49.4 % (32.04 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	53.2 % (21.55 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	12.1:1 %