BEAUMONT NURSING AND REHABILITATION

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	BEAUMONT	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have BEAUMONT
State attribute explanation	TX	vs	7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX	compare TX Nursing Homes USA
Street	1175 DENTON DR
Zip Code	77707
Phone	4098423120
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	42 (49.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (42)
Percent of Occupied Beds	35 % (48.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (35) %
Health Survey Date	2/1/2012
Fire Survey Date	1/31/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Individual	vs	3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual	compare For profit - Individual Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	2 (56.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	2 (54.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	10 (2.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	42 (49.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.61 (0.16 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.44 (0.6 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	2.04 (0.45 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.02 (5.47 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.02 (0.08 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 11/23/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 05/18/2010 date Of Correction: 06/01/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others. survey Date: 05/18/2010 date Of Correction: 06/01/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 11/23/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 11/23/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 05/18/2010 date Of Correction: 06/01/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 03/23/2011 date Of Correction: 05/13/2011

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 11/23/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 11/23/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 10/30/2009 date Of Correction: 11/23/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	50 % (24.91 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	25.1 % (8.44 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	7.6 % (8.03 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	8.1 / 8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.7 % (23.68 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	7 % (8.52 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	48.1 % (22.71 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	38.8 % (24.7 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.6 % (1.62 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	75.2 % (66.7 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	18.2:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.3 % (5.35 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	9.4 / 10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.7 % (15.16 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	22.5 % (11.77 % higher than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	26.8 % (2.04 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	13.7 % (61.05 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %