VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BENCHMARK HEALTHCARE OF PORTAGEVILLE, LLC

BENCHMARK HEALTHCARE OF PORTAGEVILLE, LLC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BENCHMARK HEALTHCARE OF PORTAGEVILLE, LLC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 75.2 % 
City PORTAGEVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PORTAGEVILLE
State attribute explanation MO   vs 3.2% Nursing Homes USA have MO
Street 290 W STATE HIGHWAY 162, PO BOX 408  
Zip Code 63873  
Phone 5733792017  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
60  (48.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
33  (58.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
55 % (28.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/19/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/19/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
33  (58.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.5 - 2.0  (0.27 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.8  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.3  (0.29 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 08/24/2010
date Of Correction: 10/04/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.
survey Date: 08/24/2010
date Of Correction: 10/04/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion.
survey Date: 08/24/2010
date Of Correction: 10/04/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 08/24/2010
date Of Correction: 10/04/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give The Right Treatment And Services To Residents Who Have Mental Or Psychosocial Problems Adjusting.
survey Date: 04/21/2009
date Of Correction: 06/17/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 04/21/2009
date Of Correction: 06/17/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Check And Assess Each Resident's Assessment At Least Every 3 Months.
survey Date: 04/21/2009
date Of Correction: 06/17/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assess The Resident When The Resident Enters The Nursing Home, In A Timely Manner.
survey Date: 04/21/2009
date Of Correction: 06/17/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Hire A Qualified Dietician.
survey Date: 08/24/2010
date Of Correction: 10/04/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.9 % (6.26 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.5 % (11.56 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
50 % (24.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.5 % (8.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.3 % (4.08 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5 % (3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10 % (33.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.9 % (9.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
15.2 % (5.62 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1 % (18.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.20 % (36.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3 % (6.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.1 % (15.66 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92 % (10.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 10.7:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.2 % (13.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved