VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BENDER TERRACE

BENDER TERRACE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BENDER TERRACE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City LUBBOCK   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have LUBBOCK
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 4510 27TH ST  
Zip Code 79410  
Phone 8067954368  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
114  (22.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/13/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/12/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
114  (22.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.27  (0.5 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.58  (0.26 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.84  (0.75 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests.
survey Date: 11/05/2009
date Of Correction: 12/19/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 11/05/2009
date Of Correction: 12/19/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Rooms That Are At Least 80 Square Feet Per Resident In Multiple Rooms And 100 Square Feet For Single Resident Rooms.
survey Date: 11/05/2009
date Of Correction: 12/19/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Dispose Of Garbage And Refuse Properly.
survey Date: 11/05/2009
date Of Correction: 12/19/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 11/05/2009
date Of Correction: 12/19/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Determine If It Is Safe For The Resident To Self-administer Drugs.
survey Date: 11/05/2009
date Of Correction: 12/19/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 11/05/2009
date Of Correction: 12/19/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
40.8 % (15.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.2 % (25.75 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7 % (9.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.1 % (8.48 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 17.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.1 % (5.44 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1 % (14.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.7 % (4.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.9 % (26.48 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 % (42.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.2 % (5.82 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.7 % (14.94 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
66.7 % (17.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.6 % (8.92 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
41.6 % (16.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.4 % (18.3 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.4-2413.6-24 % (1.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3 % (6.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
21.7 % (13.2 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40.5 % (2.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 % (9.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.5 % (3.92 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.4 % (15.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 % (37.63 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.4 % (2.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.1 % (10.66 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.7 % (12.74 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
35.4 % (39.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 11.8:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved