VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BENT- WOOD NURSING CENTER

BENT- WOOD NURSING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BENT- WOOD NURSING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City FLORISSANT   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have FLORISSANT
State attribute explanation MO   vs 3.2% Nursing Homes USA have MO
Street 1501 CHARBONIER ROAD  
Zip Code 63031  
Phone 3149212700  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
76  (32.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
67  (24.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
88 % (4.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/10/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/10/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 12/22/2009
date Of Correction: 03/05/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24.1 % (0.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.7 % (13.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.3 % (8.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.7 % (5.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3 % (10.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6 % (26.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.4 % (4.38 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.6 % (9.96 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.7 % (10.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.6 % (8.92 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 22.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.5 % (3.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.4 % (3.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10 % (1.5 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
64.2 % (20.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.3 % (8.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8 % (3.78 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.7 % (16.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1 % (37.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.4 % (2.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35.3 % (10.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.7 % (9.26 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.1 % (23.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.9 % (10.44 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved