BERNARD L SAMSON NURSING CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	SAINT PETERSBURG	vs	0.2% Nursing Homes USA have SAINT PETERSBURG
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	255 59TH ST N
Zip Code	33710
Phone	7273452775
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	180 (71.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (180)
Total Number of Residents	154 (62.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (154)
Percent of Occupied Beds	86 % (2.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (86) %
Health Survey Date	1/12/2012
Fire Survey Date	1/12/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Corporation	vs	18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation	compare Non profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	6

Staff Information
Number of Residents	154 (62.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.47 (0.3 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.31 (0.47 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.78 (0.19 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (5.39 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.1 (equals average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 05/11/2011 date Of Correction: 06/06/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 11/20/2009 date Of Correction: 12/10/2009

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed. survey Date: 05/11/2011 date Of Correction: 06/06/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible. survey Date: 11/20/2009 date Of Correction: 12/10/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs. survey Date: 11/20/2009 date Of Correction: 12/10/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/20/2009 date Of Correction: 12/10/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	22.7 (72.9) % (2.39 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	3.6 % (29.35 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	12 % (4.66 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	2.8 % (9.78 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.6 % (7.23 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	54.5 % (9.96 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.2 % (10.43 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	15.2 % (1.74 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.50 % (26.88 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	4.5 % (39.18 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	25.5 % (0.48 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	98.1 % (13.46 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	100 % (16.06 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	1.1 % (44.8 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.8 % (11.72 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	20.1 % (5.29 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	5.9 % (17.8 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.8 % (3.3 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.8 % (1.42 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.2 % (3.3 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	56.4 % (13.02 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.2 % (6.45 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	12.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.5 - 2.0 % (19.36 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	5.9 % (32.63 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4.5 % (6.23 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	29.4 % (4.64 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	97.7 % (16.26 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	100 % (25.25 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	18.3 % (0.96 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %