VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BIRCHWOOD NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

BIRCHWOOD NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BIRCHWOOD NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City NANTICOKE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have NANTICOKE
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 395 EAST MIDDLE ROAD  
Zip Code 18634  
Phone 5707352973  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
121  (12.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
108  (16.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
89 % (5.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/17/2012  
Fire Survey Date 5/4/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
108  (16.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59  (0.18 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.03  (0.19 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.62  (0.03 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (5.35 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 01/03/2011
date Of Correction: 02/22/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Properly Hold, Secure And Manage Each Resident's Personal Money Which Is Deposited With The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 04/26/2010
date Of Correction: 05/21/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Hold, Secure And Manage Each Resident's Personal Money Which Is Deposited With The Nursing Home.
survey Date: 05/26/2009
date Of Correction: 06/15/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident A Notice Of Rights, Rules, Services And Charges. Tell Each Resident Who Can Get Medicaid Benefits About 1) Which Items And Services Medicaid Covers And Which The Resident Must Pay For.
survey Date: 05/26/2009
date Of Correction: 06/15/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give The Resident's Representative The Ability To Exercise The Resident's Rights.
survey Date: 05/26/2009
date Of Correction: 06/15/2009 

Building Construction Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Approved Construction Type Or Materials.
survey Date: 11/24/2010
date Of Correction: 01/24/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.5 % (6.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.5 % (8.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.3 % (8.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.5 % (3.67 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40 % (4.54 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.7 % (8.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1 % (12.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1 % (42.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.8 % (17.22 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
67 % (17.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99 % (15.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3 % (44.6 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 % (14.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.5 % (7.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8 % (6.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 % (1.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.5 % (8 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.9 % (3.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.3 % (5.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.4 % (9.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8 % (19.06 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.7 % (35.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9 % (8.83 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9 % (15.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.3 % (0.14 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.5 % (21.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
12.7 % (4.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved