VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BORGESS GARDENS

BORGESS GARDENS

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BORGESS GARDENS VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City KALAMAZOO   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have KALAMAZOO
State attribute explanation MI   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI
Street 3057 GULL ROAD  
Zip Code 49048  
Phone 2695526500  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
121  (12.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
94  (2.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
78 % (5.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/8/2012  
Fire Survey Date 6/7/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? Yes  vs 1% Nursing Homes USA have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(51.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(48.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
24  (16.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
94  (2.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.38  (0.61 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.66  (0.18 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.04  (0.45 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.18  (5.31 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.18  (0.08 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 10/14/2011
date Of Correction: 11/11/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/20/2011
date Of Correction: 10/14/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/04/2010
date Of Correction: 01/29/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/10/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 06/10/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 06/10/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 06/10/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 06/10/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/27/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 03/16/2010
date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 03/16/2010
date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 11/03/2011
date Of Correction: 12/09/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/10/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 06/10/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 08/27/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/27/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/27/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 06/10/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 03/16/2010
date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 06/10/2011
date Of Correction: 07/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/27/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 08/27/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.
survey Date: 08/27/2010
date Of Correction: 11/04/2010 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.
survey Date: 10/14/2011
date Of Correction: 11/11/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (31.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21 % (4.34 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.3 % (4.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3 % (5.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.8 % (6.74 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.50 % (14.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.2 % (10.26 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
21.9 % (6.48 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.9 % (3.12 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.2 % (13.56 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.3 % (14.36 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1 % (44.9 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 % (12.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.3 % (19.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.4 % (3.3 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.3 % (2.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 10.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.3 % (4.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.5 - 2.0 % (10.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
19.3 % (0.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 % (9.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.3 (79.3) % (1.54 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.1 % (16.66 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96 % (21.25 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.7 % (7.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved