VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BRADLEY ROYALE

BRADLEY ROYALE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BRADLEY ROYALE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BRADLEY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BRADLEY
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 650 NORTH KINZIE  
Zip Code 60915  
Phone 8159331666  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
120  (11.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
100  (8.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
83 % (0.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/16/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/20/2012  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 75.2 % 
Staff Information
Number of Residents
100  (8.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.6  (0.17 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.27  (0.57 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.86  (0.73 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (5.48 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01  (0.09 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/16/2012
date Of Correction: 04/18/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/04/2011
date Of Correction: 03/18/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/09/2009
date Of Correction: 11/05/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/15/2012
date Of Correction: 06/15/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 10/09/2009
date Of Correction: 11/05/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 10/09/2009
date Of Correction: 11/05/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.4 % (1.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.7 % (12.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6 % (8.98 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.2 % (8.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.5 % (12.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 % (12.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.1 % (11.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
33.3 % (8.28 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
77.3 % (7.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
81.8 % (2.14 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.1 % (0.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2 % (21.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.8 % (10.3 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.3 % (4.92 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.6 % (4.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.5 % (7.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.8 % (6.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4 % (5.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 % (8.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.9-24 % (7.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
65.1 % (16.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.4 % (11.65 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved