BRANDON HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	Brandon	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have Brandon
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	1465 OAKFIELD DR
Zip Code	33511
Phone	8136550404
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (1)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	113 (21.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (113)
Percent of Occupied Beds	94 % (10.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (94) %
Health Survey Date	7/8/2011
Fire Survey Date	7/12/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	7

Staff Information
Number of Residents	113 (21.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.53 (0.24 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.18 (0.66 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.7 (0.89 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.18 (5.31 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.18 (0.08 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 04/19/2012 date Of Correction: 05/09/2012

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 04/19/2012 date Of Correction: 05/09/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function. survey Date: 11/08/2010 date Of Correction: 11/29/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 11/08/2010 date Of Correction: 11/29/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Coordinate Assessments With The Pre-admission Screening And Resident Review Program For Mentally-ill And Mentally-retarded Patients. survey Date: 04/20/2010 date Of Correction: 04/30/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 04/19/2012 date Of Correction: 05/09/2012

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 04/19/2012 date Of Correction: 05/09/2012

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	17 % (8.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.5 - 2.0 % (32.45 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	11.1 % (5.56 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	3.9 % (7.93 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.9 % (11.73 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	13.7 % (0.24 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	5.7 % (22.68 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	3.8 % (39.88 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	22.3 % (2.72 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	97.8 % (13.16 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	99.4 % (15.46 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	1.50 % (44.4 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	18.2:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.1 % (22.6 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	24.2 % (10.1 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	9.1 % (0.12 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	2.5 % (6 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	22 % (21.38 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.8 % (6.85 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	18.4 % (8.82 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	11.3 % (8.56 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	4.4 % (34.13 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	75.2 % (64.47 % higher than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	23.5 % (1.26 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	96.1 % (14.66 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	99.3 % (24.55 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	19 % (1.66 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %