VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BRASWELL'S COMMUNITY CONVALESCENT CENTER, LP

BRASWELL'S COMMUNITY CONVALESCENT CENTER, LP

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BRASWELL'S COMMUNITY CONVALESCENT CENTER, LP VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City YUCAIPA   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have YUCAIPA
State attribute explanation CA   vs 7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street 13542 SECOND ST.  
Zip Code 92399  
Phone 9097953821  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
82  (26.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
75  (16.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
91 % (7.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/8/2012  
Fire Survey Date 6/15/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 23  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
75  (16.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Let Residents Voice A Complaint Or Grievance Without Being Treated Differently Or Badly.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Let Each Resident Choose A Personal Doctor.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Tell The Resident Completely About His Or Her Health Status, Care And Treatments.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Routine And 24-hour Emergency Dental Care For Each Resident.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents With Reduced Range Of Motion Get Proper Treatment And Services To Increase Range Of Motion.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.
survey Date: 07/28/2010
date Of Correction: 09/17/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.7 % (13.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8 % (29.15 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13 % (3.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1 % (7.48 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.8 % (6.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8 % (7.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9 % (25.48 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 8.6:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
40.9 % (15.88 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.9 % (4.26 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
80.6 % (3.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 % (12.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
40.2 % (14.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (22.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 15.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5 % (6.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.7 % (3.8 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.9 % (0.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.50 % (9.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2 % (5.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.3 % (8.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 7.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 % (8.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.7 % (11.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.9 % (4.46 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
20.7 (69.3) % (54.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2 % (15.34 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved