VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BRENHAM NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

BRENHAM NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BRENHAM NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BRENHAM   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BRENHAM
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 400 SAYLES ST  
Zip Code 77833  
Phone 9798369770  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
108  (0.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
114  (22.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
106 % (22.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/15/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/16/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(52.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(49.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
32  (24.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
114  (22.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.27  (0.5 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.69  (0.15 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.96  (0.63 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (5.44 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: 04/25/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: 04/25/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 12/03/2009
date Of Correction: 01/02/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/16/2009
date Of Correction: 11/18/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That A Working Call System Is Available In Each Resident's Room Or Bathroom And Bathing Area.
survey Date: 08/13/2009
date Of Correction: 09/13/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 08/13/2009
date Of Correction: 09/13/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: 04/25/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: 04/25/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: 04/25/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 10/16/2009
date Of Correction: 11/18/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 10/25/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 10/25/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 10/25/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 03/09/2010
date Of Correction: 04/07/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 12/03/2009
date Of Correction: 01/02/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 12/03/2009
date Of Correction: 01/02/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.
survey Date: 08/13/2009
date Of Correction: 09/13/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 12/03/2009
date Of Correction: 01/02/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 12/03/2009
date Of Correction: 01/02/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 12/03/2009
date Of Correction: 01/02/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 08/13/2009
date Of Correction: 09/13/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 08/13/2009
date Of Correction: 09/13/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: 04/25/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 12/03/2009
date Of Correction: 01/02/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 09/25/2009
date Of Correction: 10/25/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/13/2009
date Of Correction: 09/13/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 08/13/2009
date Of Correction: 09/13/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.
survey Date: 08/13/2009
date Of Correction: 09/13/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 12/03/2009
date Of Correction: 01/02/2010 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.
survey Date: 03/15/2012
date Of Correction: 04/25/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 12/03/2009
date Of Correction: 01/02/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Food In A Way That Meets A Resident's Needs.
survey Date: 12/03/2009
date Of Correction: 01/02/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.4 % (6.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.1 % (30.85 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.8 % (3.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3 % (8.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
40 % (4.54 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.1 % (14.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.1 % (4.36 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
27 % (1.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4 % (39.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.7 % (8.32 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81 % (3.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.1 % (6.84 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
(44.9 lower than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3 % (12.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.4 % (3.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.6 % (23.1 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.4 % (7.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.4 % (0.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.8 % (0.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.1 % (13.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.3 % (9.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
56.6 % (36.74 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (36.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3 % (6.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 14.7:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.9 % (2.54 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
35.4 % (39.35 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved