BRIGHTON GARDENS OF SUN CITY

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	SUN CITY	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have SUN CITY
State attribute explanation	AZ	vs	0.9% Nursing Homes USA have AZ	compare AZ Nursing Homes USA
Street	17225 NORTH BOSWELL ROAD
Zip Code	85373
Phone	6239332222
Overall Star Rating	4 (0.89 higher than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (4)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (5)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	5 (1.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (5)
Number of Certified Beds	58 (50.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (58)
Total Number of Residents	26 (65.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (26)
Percent of Occupied Beds	45 % (38.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (45) %
Health Survey Date	2/9/2012
Fire Survey Date	2/17/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare	vs	5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare	compare Medicare Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	8

Staff Information
Number of Residents	26 (65.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.50 (0.73 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.12 (0.28 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	2.61 (1.02 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.47 (5.02 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.47 (0.37 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That A Working Call System Is Available In Each Resident's Room Or Bathroom And Bathing Area. survey Date: 05/06/2009 date Of Correction: 06/10/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 10/01/2009 date Of Correction: 11/08/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 10/01/2009 date Of Correction: 11/08/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 09/28/2010 date Of Correction: 11/02/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 10/01/2009 date Of Correction: 11/08/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Proper Discharge Planning And Communication, Of The Resident's Health Status And Summary Of The Resident's Stay. survey Date: 09/28/2010 date Of Correction: 11/02/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 09/28/2010 date Of Correction: 11/02/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 05/06/2009 date Of Correction: 06/10/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1 % (31.95 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	35.4 % (10.38 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	94 % (9.36 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	94 % (10.06 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	26 % (1.24 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93 % (11.56 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	93 % (18.25 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	1.7 % (15.64 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %