BROOKVILLE HEALTHCARE CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	BROOKVILLE	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have BROOKVILLE
State attribute explanation	IN	vs	3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN	compare IN Nursing Homes USA
Street	11049 SR 101
Zip Code	47012
Phone	7656472527
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	100 (8.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (100)
Total Number of Residents	86 (5.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (86)
Percent of Occupied Beds	86 % (2.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (86) %
Health Survey Date	1/13/2012
Fire Survey Date	1/18/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Partnership	vs	7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership	compare For profit - Partnership Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	14 (6.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	86 (5.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.52 (0.25 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.16 (0.32 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.68 (0.09 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.07 (5.42 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.07 (0.03 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 10/22/2010 date Of Correction: 12/07/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 07/22/2010 date Of Correction: 07/26/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services. survey Date: 06/30/2010 date Of Correction: 07/06/2010

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 06/28/2012 date Of Correction: 07/09/2012

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 12/07/2010 date Of Correction: 12/08/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 07/20/2011 date Of Correction: 07/27/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 12/07/2010 date Of Correction: 12/08/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/30/2010 date Of Correction: 07/06/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 06/30/2010 date Of Correction: 07/06/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 12/07/2010 date Of Correction: 12/08/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 07/22/2010 date Of Correction: 07/26/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 06/30/2010 date Of Correction: 07/06/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 07/22/2010 date Of Correction: 07/26/2010

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 12/07/2010 date Of Correction: 12/08/2010

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	9.5 % (15.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	5.1 % (27.85 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	25.9 % (9.24 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	12.5 % (0.08 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	8.1 / 8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.8 % (12.83 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	10.8 % (2.66 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	14.3 % (14.08 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	45.9 % (20.88 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	100 % (15.36 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	95.7 % (11.76 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2.8 % (43.1 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4 % (11.52 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	10.9 % (14.49 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	6.4 % (17.3 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	21.7 % (7.6 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	10.2 % (0.98 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	11.1 % (2.6 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	34.6 % (8.78 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.8 % (8.85 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	13.3 % (3.72 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	11.4 % (8.46 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.4 % (38.13 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.5 % (7.23 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	38 % (13.24 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	94.3 % (12.86 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	94.2 % (19.45 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	23.6 % (6.26 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %