VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > BROWNWOOD NURSING AND REHABILITATION LP

BROWNWOOD NURSING AND REHABILITATION LP

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
BROWNWOOD NURSING AND REHABILITATION LP VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BROWNWOOD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BROWNWOOD
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 101 MILLER DR  
Zip Code 76801  
Phone 3256439555  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
128  (19.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
66  (25.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
52 % (31.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/27/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/9/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
11  (3.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
66  (25.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29  (0.48 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.99  (0.15 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.28  (0.31 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 02/01/2012
date Of Correction: 03/19/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/01/2012
date Of Correction: 03/19/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/01/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 05/25/2010
date Of Correction: 06/21/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 05/25/2010
date Of Correction: 06/21/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 05/25/2010
date Of Correction: 06/21/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 05/25/2010
date Of Correction: 06/21/2010 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 01/11/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2010 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 01/11/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 01/07/2011
date Of Correction: 01/10/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 02/01/2012
date Of Correction: 03/19/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34 % (8.91 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.1 % (7.44 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2 % (9.38 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7 % (8.13 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.3 % (13.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
17.6 % (10.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
7 % (36.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.1 % (2.46 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.6 % (6.66 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7 % (8.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.5 % (7.11 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.6 % (8.5 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.9 % (6.32 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8 % (1.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.3 % (10.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.2 % (7.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.6 % (8.98 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 17.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.5 % (33.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.6 % (4.13 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
43.7 % (18.94 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.9 % (3.46 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.3 % (2.55 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 12.8:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved