VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CADIA REHABILITATION PIKE CREEK

CADIA REHABILITATION PIKE CREEK

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CADIA REHABILITATION PIKE CREEK VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City WILMINGTON   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have WILMINGTON
State attribute explanation DE   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have DE
Street 3540 THREE LITTLE BAKERS BLVD  
Zip Code 19808  
Phone 3024550808  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
130  (21.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
114  (22.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
88 % (4.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 8/31/2011  
Fire Survey Date 8/30/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 26  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
114  (22.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94  (0.17 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.85  (0.01 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.79  (0.2 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.17  (5.32 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.17  (0.07 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/01/2011
date Of Correction: 05/26/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 03/01/2011
date Of Correction: 05/26/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 03/01/2011
date Of Correction: 05/26/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 03/01/2011
date Of Correction: 05/26/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 02/03/2012
date Of Correction: 05/01/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 02/03/2012
date Of Correction: 05/01/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/03/2012
date Of Correction: 05/01/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 03/01/2011
date Of Correction: 05/26/2011 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.
survey Date: 07/13/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 07/13/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 

Deficiency #10 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/13/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 07/13/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 07/13/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/01/2011
date Of Correction: 05/26/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 07/13/2010
date Of Correction: 09/08/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor.
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 08/17/2011
date Of Correction: 12/06/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.9-28 % (10.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (31.95 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.3 % (7.64 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.3 % (0.72 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.4 % (10.43 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.3 % (9.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.2 % (5.26 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.5 % (16.88 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.1 % (39.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.7 (72.9) % (2.32 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.9 % (6.26 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
91.8 % (7.86 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.1 % (43.8 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (14.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.9-28 % (10.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0 % (23.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.9 % (14.8 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
15.1 % (5.88 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.9 % (6.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.6 % (8.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.5 % (6.15 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.1 % (4.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 10.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.3 % (36.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5 - 2.0 % (10.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.3 % (5.46 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.9 % (10.46 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
91.1 % (16.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.20 % (15.14 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved