VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CAMELOT HALL CONVALESCENT CTR

CAMELOT HALL CONVALESCENT CTR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CAMELOT HALL CONVALESCENT CTR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Number of Residents 75.2 % 
City LIVONIA   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have LIVONIA
State attribute explanation MI   vs 2.8% Nursing Homes USA have MI
Street 35100 ANN ARBOR TRAIL  
Zip Code 48150  
Phone 7345221444  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
142  (33.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
109  (17.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
77 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 6/8/2012  
Fire Survey Date 6/8/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
18  (10.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/10/2012
date Of Correction: 03/02/2012 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/19/2011
date Of Correction: 01/17/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 12/19/2011
date Of Correction: 01/17/2012 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 12/19/2011
date Of Correction: 01/17/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 03/19/2012
date Of Correction: 03/26/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 02/10/2012
date Of Correction: 03/02/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 02/10/2012
date Of Correction: 03/02/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 02/10/2012
date Of Correction: 03/02/2012 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/28/2011
date Of Correction: 03/23/2012 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 02/16/2011
date Of Correction: 03/17/2011 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 01/22/2010
date Of Correction: 02/27/2010 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 01/22/2010
date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 

Deficiency #9 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 01/22/2010
date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 

Deficiency #10 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 01/22/2010
date Of Correction: 04/09/2010 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.
survey Date: 01/19/2012
date Of Correction: 03/16/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 12/28/2011
date Of Correction: 02/01/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep The Rate Of Medication Errors (wrong Drug, Wrong Dose, Wrong Time) To Less Than 5%.
survey Date: 02/16/2011
date Of Correction: 03/17/2011 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Hire Sufficient Dietary Support Personnel.
survey Date: 02/16/2011
date Of Correction: 03/17/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.5 % (9.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.20 % (30.75 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6 % (13.06 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11.7 % (0.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10 % (1.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4 % (11.63 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8 % (5.46 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2 % (41.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.6 (65.5) % (6.42 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
28 % (56.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 15.9:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.9 % (10.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16 % (9.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.3 % (19.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.5 % (6.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.6 % (0.38 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.4 % (3.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.2 % (8.18 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.9 % (6.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7 % (2.58 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.7 % (18.16 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.7 % (33.83 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.7 % (6.03 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.2 % (0.44 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
29.5 % (51.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened 17.8:1 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
20 % (2.66 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved