VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CANEY NURSING CENTER

CANEY NURSING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CANEY NURSING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CANEY   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CANEY
State attribute explanation KS   vs 2.2% Nursing Homes USA have KS
Street 615 S HIGH ST  
Zip Code 67333  
Phone 6208792929  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
58  (50.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
33  (58.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
57 % (26.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/3/2011  
Fire Survey Date 4/5/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicaid  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
11  (3.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 75.2 % 
Staff Information
Number of Residents
33  (58.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.62  (0.15 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.48  (0.36 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.11  (0.48 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 09/11/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Comfortable And Safe Temperature Levels.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 09/11/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 09/11/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 04/16/2009
date Of Correction: 04/30/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Access To A Telephone For Resident To Use In Private.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 08/12/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Send And Promptly Deliver Unopened Mail To Residents.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 09/11/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 09/11/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 09/11/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 09/11/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 09/11/2010 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 08/12/2010
date Of Correction: 09/11/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.1 % (5.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.9 % (7.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 14.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.9 % (40.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 % (12.62 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
46 % (20.61 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11 % (3.1 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 % (65.98 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.3 % (0.2 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.6 % (10.78 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.8 % (7.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.1 % (3.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 13.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1 % (37.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
26.5 % (15.77 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
45.8 % (28.95 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %



Scroll To Top

saved