VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CANTERBURY MANOR NURSING CTR

CANTERBURY MANOR NURSING CTR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CANTERBURY MANOR NURSING CTR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City WATERLOO   vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have WATERLOO
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 718 NORTH MARKET STREET  
Zip Code 62298  
Phone 6189398565  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
74  (34.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
44  (47.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
59 % (24.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/29/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/28/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
44  (47.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.65  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.52  (0.32 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.17  (0.42 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/25/2010
date Of Correction: 09/14/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 02/02/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 02/02/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 05/16/2011
date Of Correction: 05/16/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 08/25/2010
date Of Correction: 09/14/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.
survey Date: 05/16/2011
date Of Correction: 06/01/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 08/25/2010
date Of Correction: 09/14/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.5 % (12.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
75.2 % (63.37 % higher than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 % (12.33 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.5 % (5.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10 % (18.38 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.4 % (13.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.4 % (14.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1 % (13 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.2 % (8.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4 % (6.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.9 % (21.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 % (6.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9 % (10.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
12.4-2413.6-24 % (1.67 % higher than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 13.9 / 15.3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
53.6 % (27.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
15.5 % (59.25 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.7 % (13.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved