VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CARE HAVEN CENTER

CARE HAVEN CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CARE HAVEN CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City MARTINSBURG   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have MARTINSBURG
State attribute explanation WV   vs 0.8% Nursing Homes USA have WV
Street 2720 CHARLES TOWN ROAD  
Zip Code 25401  
Phone 3042630933  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
68  (40.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
67  (24.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
99 % (15.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/29/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/28/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
67  (24.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.05  (0.28 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.51  (0.33 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.56  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (5.34 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (0.05 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 04/21/2011
date Of Correction: 05/13/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 12/21/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.
survey Date: 12/21/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 12/21/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 12/21/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/21/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 12/21/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.
survey Date: 12/21/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2011 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 12/21/2010
date Of Correction: 02/15/2011 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17 % (8.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 % (31.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.5 % (3.16 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.5 % (6.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6 % (5.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 % (11.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8 % (9.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
50 % (24.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8 % (12.16 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.3 % (11.36 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.6 % (5.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3 % (22.4 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.5 % (0.6 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.5 % (2.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6 % (2.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 % (6.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8 % (5.78 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
50 % (25.24 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.3 % (20.55 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 % (14.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved