Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
| CARE INN OF ABILENE | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
| Staff Information | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Residents |
85 (6.38 lower than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
| Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 01/24/2012 date Of Correction: 01/27/2012 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 05/19/2011 date Of Correction: 06/30/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 07/07/2010 date Of Correction: 08/06/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 06/10/2010 date Of Correction: 07/15/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 07/20/2009 date Of Correction: 07/23/2009 |
||||
| Mistreatment Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property. survey Date: 06/13/2011 date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 03/02/2010 date Of Correction: 04/15/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 07/20/2009 date Of Correction: 07/23/2009 |
||||
| Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 07/20/2009 date Of Correction: 07/23/2009 |
||||
| Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 05/07/2009 date Of Correction: 06/20/2009 |
||||
| Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 04/06/2012 date Of Correction: 04/07/2012 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 06/13/2011 date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 07/20/2009 date Of Correction: 07/23/2009 |
||||
| Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Notify The Resident Or Provide Reasons For A Transfer Or Discharge. survey Date: 07/20/2009 date Of Correction: 07/23/2009 |
||||
| Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 01/19/2012 date Of Correction: 01/23/2012 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/13/2011 date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 06/13/2011 date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #4 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 03/25/2011 date Of Correction: 05/06/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #5 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 03/02/2010 date Of Correction: 04/15/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #6 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 07/20/2009 date Of Correction: 07/23/2009 |
||||
| Administration Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/13/2011 date Of Correction: 07/08/2011 |
||||
| Deficiency #2 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Employ Qualified Full-time, Part-time Or Consultant Professionals That Must Be Licensed, Certified, Or Registered Staff To Give Needed Services. survey Date: 03/02/2010 date Of Correction: 04/15/2010 |
||||
| Deficiency #3 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 05/07/2009 date Of Correction: 06/20/2009 |
||||
| Pharmacy Service Deficiencies | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 03/25/2011 date Of Correction: 05/06/2011 |
||||
| Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
30.3 % (5.21 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
7.1 % (25.85 % lower than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
6.4 % (10.26 % lower than average)
|
vs |
16.66 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
15.8 % (3.22 % higher than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
3.8 % (8.03 % lower than average)
|
vs |
11.83 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
2.7 % (12.93 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
11.4 % (2.06 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
47.9 % (19.52 % higher than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
7.6 % (36.08 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
34.8 % (9.78 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.02 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
53.7 % (30.94 % lower than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
48.8 % (35.14 % lower than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
1 (44.9 lower than average)
|
vs |
45.90
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
3.8 % (11.72 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
||
| Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
31.7 % (6.31 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased | 5.6:1 % | ||||
| Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
5.8 % (8.3 % lower than average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
12.7 % (3.48 % higher than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight |
5.2 % (3.3 % lower than average)
|
vs |
8.50 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
42.9 % (0.48 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
3.8 % (6.85 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
11.2-20 % (1.62 % higher than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
31.4 (88.5) % (11.54 % higher than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
| Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 5.6:1 % | ||||
| Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
3.4 % (7.33 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
30.6 % (5.84 % higher than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
55.4 % (26.04 % lower than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
21 % (53.75 % lower than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
| Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
75.2 % (57.86 % higher than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|
||