VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CARE INN OF LA GRANGE

CARE INN OF LA GRANGE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CARE INN OF LA GRANGE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City LA GRANGE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have LA GRANGE
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 457 N MAIN ST  
Zip Code 78945  
Phone 9799685865  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
98  (10.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
56  (35.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
57 % (26.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/6/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/6/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
18  (10.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
56  (35.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.43  (0.34 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.79  (0.05 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.22  (0.37 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.17  (5.32 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.17  (0.07 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 06/05/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide At Least One Room Set Aside To Use As A Resident Dining Room And For Activities, That Is A Good Size, With Good Lighting, Air Flow And Furniture.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Rooms That Are At Least 80 Square Feet Per Resident In Multiple Rooms And 100 Square Feet For Single Resident Rooms.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 06/05/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep All Essential Equipment Working Safely.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Deficiency #6 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Deficiency #7 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Deficiency #8 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/10/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Send And Promptly Deliver Unopened Mail To Residents.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 06/06/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Quickly Tell The Resident's Doctor The Results Of Lab Tests.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Provide 3 Meals At Regular Times; 2) Serve Breakfast Within 14 Hours After Dinner; Or 3) Offer A Snack At Bedtime Each Day.
survey Date: 06/04/2009
date Of Correction: 07/18/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.9 % (1.19 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1 % (14.56 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
16.1 % (3.52 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.6 % (2.23 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.1 % (0.44 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 % (13.43 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 % (61.74 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.8 % (22.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4 % (11.76 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 % (11.72 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.6 % (2.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1 % (20.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6 % (12.5 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.6-28 % (4.38 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.9 % (3.6 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
38.4 % (4.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.8 % (7.85 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.1 % (7.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.6 % (12.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.5 % (35.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 % (8.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4 % (20.76 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.9 % (7.46 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
89.5 % (14.75 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.1 % (15.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved