CARING HANDS HEALTH CARE CENTER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	75.2 %
City	PERU	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have PERU
State attribute explanation	IN	vs	3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN	compare IN Nursing Homes USA
Street	1850 MATADOR ST
Zip Code	46970
Phone	7656895000
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	2 (1.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (2)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	92 (16.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (92)
Total Number of Residents	71 (20.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (71)
Percent of Occupied Beds	77 % (6.65 % lower than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (77) %
Health Survey Date	6/7/2012
Fire Survey Date	6/19/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Corporation	vs	18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation	compare Non profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	5 (53.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	5 (51.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	8 (0.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	71 (20.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.48 (0.29 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.47 (0.63 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.94 (0.35 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.08 (5.41 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.08 (0.02 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Let The Resident Refuse Treatment Or Refuse To Take Part In An Experiment And Formulate Advance Directives. survey Date: 04/20/2012 date Of Correction: 05/02/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give The Resident's Representative The Ability To Exercise The Resident's Rights. survey Date: 04/07/2011 date Of Correction: 05/07/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/10/2011 date Of Correction: 12/05/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life. survey Date: 04/07/2011 date Of Correction: 05/07/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 10/20/2009 date Of Correction: 11/05/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 04/07/2011 date Of Correction: 05/07/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 04/07/2011 date Of Correction: 05/07/2011

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 04/07/2011 date Of Correction: 05/07/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	27 % (1.91 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	6.1 % (26.85 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	8.8 % (7.86 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	8.9 / 9.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	12.5 % (0.67 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.4 % (11.23 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	9.4 / 10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	22.2:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	81.8 % (2.84 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	61.4 % (22.54 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	3.3 % (42.6 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	6.3 % (9.22 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	27.9 % (2.51 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	7.2 % (16.5 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.7 % (2.6 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	9.7 % (0.48 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7.4 % (1.1 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	59.8 % (16.42 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.7 % (5.95 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6.4 % (3.18 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1 % (18.86 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1 % (37.53 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	5.9 % (4.83 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	31.1 % (6.34 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	78.1 % (3.34 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	53.7 % (21.05 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	13.7 % (3.64 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %