CARING HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CARE & REHAB CTR

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	CORAOPOLIS	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have CORAOPOLIS
State attribute explanation	PA	vs	4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA	compare PA Nursing Homes USA
Street	234 CORAOPOLIS ROAD
Zip Code	15108
Phone	4123316060
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	109 (17.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (109)
Percent of Occupied Beds	91 % (7.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (91) %
Health Survey Date	10/6/2011
Fire Survey Date	10/17/2011
Sprinkler Status	Partially Sprinklered	vs	8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	2 (56.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	2 (54.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	15 (7.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	109 (17.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.92 (0.15 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.65 (0.19 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.57 (0.02 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.05 (5.44 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.05 (0.05 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 08/20/2009 date Of Correction: 09/21/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 01/24/2012 date Of Correction: 02/28/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 09/29/2009 date Of Correction: 11/03/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 08/20/2009 date Of Correction: 09/21/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 01/24/2012 date Of Correction: 02/28/2012

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 08/20/2009 date Of Correction: 09/21/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Choose A Doctor To Serve As The Medical Director To Create Resident Care Policies And Coordinate Medical Care In The Facility. survey Date: 08/20/2009 date Of Correction: 09/21/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 08/20/2009 date Of Correction: 09/21/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 06/23/2010 date Of Correction: 07/27/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 12/03/2009 date Of Correction: 12/21/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 12/03/2009 date Of Correction: 12/21/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 08/20/2009 date Of Correction: 09/21/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 08/20/2009 date Of Correction: 08/24/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 08/20/2009 date Of Correction: 08/24/2009

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way. survey Date: 10/06/2011 date Of Correction: 11/15/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	21.5 % (3.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.8 % (32.15 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	22.6 % (5.94 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	8.2 % (4.38 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	6.3 % (5.53 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	52.5 % (7.96 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	1.1 % (12.36 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.1 % (27.28 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	23.1 % (1.92 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	60.2 % (24.44 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	61.2 % (22.74 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.1 % (13.42 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	21.1 % (4.29 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.4 % (22.3 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	19.5-24 % (5.4 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.3 % (2.92 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	7.3 % (1.2 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	47.4 % (4.02 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	6.6 % (4.05 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	1.7 % (7.88 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	0.3 % (19.56 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.7 % (37.83 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.8 % (7.93 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	22.4:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	48 % (33.44 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	73.5 % (1.25 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	22.6 % (5.26 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %