VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CARONDELET MANOR

CARONDELET MANOR

Details Rankings Comparisons Alternatives Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CARONDELET MANOR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City KANSAS CITY   vs 0.2% Nursing Homes USA have KANSAS CITY
State attribute explanation MO   vs 3.2% Nursing Homes USA have MO
Street 621 CARONDELET DRIVE  
Zip Code 64114  
Phone 8169434777  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
162  (53.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
124  (32.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
77 % (6.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/7/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/7/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Church Related  vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Church related
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
124  (32.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.56  (0.21 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74  (0.1 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.3  (0.29 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.
survey Date: 10/07/2011
date Of Correction: 11/21/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 10/07/2011
date Of Correction: 11/21/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 03/22/2011
date Of Correction: 05/13/2011 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 11/10/2009
date Of Correction: 12/24/2009 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.
survey Date: 11/10/2009
date Of Correction: 12/24/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 11/10/2009
date Of Correction: 12/24/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 19.4:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (31.75 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.6 % (7.06 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.5 % (4.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.8 % (2.03 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.6 (78.1) % (18.94 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 % (12.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 14.7:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.9 % (23.48 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.8 % (6.78 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.3 % (6.34 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
81.5 % (2.44 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7 % (44.2 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1 % (14.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.1 (71.8) % (3.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7 % (22 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 8.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.2 % (3.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.7 % (1.2 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.7 % (13.68 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.6 % (7.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.8 % (4.22 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.3 % (13.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 % (8.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.1 % (6.34 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.8 % (9.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
64.6 % (10.15 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 11.8:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved