CASITAS CARE CENTER | comparical.com

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

CASITAS CARE CENTER

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	GRANADA HILLS	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have GRANADA HILLS
State attribute explanation	CA	vs	7.8% Nursing Homes USA have CA
Street	10626 BALBOA BLVD.
Zip Code	91344
Phone	8183682802
Overall Star Rating	3 (0.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (3)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	4 (0.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (4)
RN Only Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (3)
Number of Certified Beds	99 (9.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (99)
Total Number of Residents	93 (1.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (93)
Percent of Occupied Beds	94 % (10.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (94) %
Health Survey Date	5/2/2012
Fire Survey Date	5/9/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	24

Staff Information
Number of Residents	93 (1.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.58 (0.19 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.78 (0.06 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.35 (0.24 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.14 (5.35 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.14 (0.04 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #9		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #10		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #11		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #12		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 11/08/2009 date Of Correction: 11/30/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	19.5-24 % (5.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.9 % (32.05 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	10.2 % (6.46 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	11.9 % (0.68 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	1.2 % (10.63 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	45.5 % (0.96 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.2 % (10.43 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	2.5 % (10.96 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.5 % (41.18 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	20.5 % (4.52 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	89 % (4.36 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	84 % (0.06 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.2 % (14.32 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.3 % (22.4 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	8.9 / 9.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	12.7 % (3.48 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	0.8 % (7.7 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	46.4 % (3.02 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	5.1 % (5.55 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	3.8 % (5.78 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (55.34 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	3.7 % (34.83 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	0.4 % (10.33 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	21.2:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	94.1 % (12.66 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	91 % (16.25 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	10.3:1 %