VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CEDAR HILL CARE CENTER

CEDAR HILL CARE CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CEDAR HILL CARE CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City ZANESVILLE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have ZANESVILLE
State attribute explanation OH   vs 6.2% Nursing Homes USA have OH
Street 1136 ADAIR AVENUE  
Zip Code 43701  
Phone 7404546823  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
99  (9.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
93  (1.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 1/14/2012  
Fire Survey Date 1/17/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

Staff Information
Number of Residents
93  (1.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.53  (0.24 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.86  (0.02 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.39  (0.2 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.1 % (9.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (32.05 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 19.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.9 % (10.68 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.6 % (5.23 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
45.7 % (1.16 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
9.8 % (5.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.2 % (4.26 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.3 % (19.08 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37 % (11.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.6 % (6.04 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.6 % (4.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.8 % (10.59 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4 % (19.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.3 % (9.2 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1 % (4.12 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.1 % (0.6 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.6 % (1.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.1 % (3.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.1 % (0.48 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
15.2 % (4.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.4 % (10.33 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
46.1 % (21.34 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.5 % (4.06 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
82.1 % (7.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11 % (6.34 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved