VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CENTER HOME HISPANIC ELDERLY

CENTER HOME HISPANIC ELDERLY

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CENTER HOME HISPANIC ELDERLY VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Chicago  vs 0.6% Nursing Homes USA have Chicago
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 1401 NORTH CALIFORNIA  
Zip Code 60622  
Phone 7737828700  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
156  (47.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
145  (53.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
93 % (9.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/23/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/30/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Individual  vs 3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
145  (53.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.32  (0.45 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.28  (0.56 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59  (1 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 09/08/2011
date Of Correction: 09/23/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 10/14/2010
date Of Correction: 11/05/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 04/03/2009
date Of Correction: 04/24/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.
survey Date: 10/14/2010
date Of Correction: 11/05/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.
survey Date: 09/08/2011
date Of Correction: 09/23/2011 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 1
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 06/30/2011
date Of Correction: 07/25/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.
survey Date: 07/21/2009
date Of Correction: 08/18/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.9 % (1.81 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.7 % (11.96 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.5 % (2.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.1 / 8.8 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
4.4 % (40.14 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.8 % (14.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4 % (12.06 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
36.2 % (7.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
30.2 % (54.44 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
41.9 % (42.04 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 % (13.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22 % (3.39 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.8 % (1.58 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.8 % (0.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.5 % (28.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.1 % (9.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2 % (8.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
23.4 % (3.54 % higher than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 % (8.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.5 % (11.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
25.5 % (55.94 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
29.6 % (45.15 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
22.5 % (5.16 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved