VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CENTRE CREST HOME

CENTRE CREST HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CENTRE CREST HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the pneumococcal vaccine 75.2 % 
City BELLEFONTE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BELLEFONTE
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 502 EAST HOWARD STREET  
Zip Code 16823  
Phone 8143556777  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
240  (131.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
225  (133.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/6/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/13/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Government - County  vs 2.9% Nursing Homes USA have Government - County
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
225  (133.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.45  (0.32 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.13  (0.29 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.58  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (5.42 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/11/2011
date Of Correction: 09/02/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment.
survey Date: 01/20/2011
date Of Correction: 01/28/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.
survey Date: 05/12/2009
date Of Correction: 06/12/2009 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/11/2011
date Of Correction: 09/02/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.
survey Date: 06/30/2009
date Of Correction: 07/24/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Or Get Quality Lab Services/tests In A Timely Manner To Meet The Needs Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/11/2011
date Of Correction: 10/07/2011 

Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Menus Meet The Resident's Nutritional Needs And That There Is A Prepared Menu By Which Nutritious Meals Have Been Planned For The Resident And Followed.
survey Date: 04/19/2011
date Of Correction: 04/29/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.
survey Date: 06/30/2009
date Of Correction: 07/24/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.8 % (2.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13 % (3.66 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 11.8:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5 % (8.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
53.8 % (9.26 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder 5.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
15.7 % (2.24 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.8 % (21.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.9 % (1.12 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.4 % (9.24 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
73.6 % (10.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.8 % (42.1 % lower than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6 % (9.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.6 % (1.79 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 % (21.2 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.3 % (0.2 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.4 % (0.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.6 % (3.9 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
53.8 % (10.42 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.4 % (7.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14.8 % (5.22 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.4 % (13.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.8 % (5.93 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.4 % (0.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.2 % (3.24 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
68.7 % (6.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 22.2:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved