VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CHARLESGATE NURSING CENTER

CHARLESGATE NURSING CENTER

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CHARLESGATE NURSING CENTER VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Providence  vs 0.1% Nursing Homes USA have Providence
State attribute explanation RI   vs 0.5% Nursing Homes USA have RI
Street 100 RANDALL STREET  
Zip Code 2904  
Phone 4018615858  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

Number of Certified Beds
140  (31.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
127  (35.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
91 % (7.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 3/16/2012  
Fire Survey Date 3/16/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(1.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
127  (35.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/31/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.
survey Date: 08/31/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 06/30/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 06/30/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 06/30/2009
date Of Correction: 06/30/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Each Resident A Notice Of Rights, Rules, Services And Charges. Tell Each Resident Who Can Get Medicaid Benefits About 1) Which Items And Services Medicaid Covers And Which The Resident Must Pay For.
survey Date: 06/30/2009
date Of Correction: 07/17/2009 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That A Doctor Approves A Resident's Admission In Writing And That Each Resident Remains Under The Care Of A Doctor.
survey Date: 08/31/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Assess The Resident When The Resident Enters The Nursing Home, In A Timely Manner.
survey Date: 08/31/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.
survey Date: 02/16/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.2 % (6.11 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.4 % (8.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6 % (6.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.5 % (8.04 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.1 % (12.53 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3 % (9.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.6 % (21.78 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.7 % (41.98 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.5 % (14.52 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.8 % (15.84 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
59.7 % (24.24 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.4 % (12.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.1 % (3.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.4 % (2.82 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.1 % (0.6 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.3 % (13.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 % (8.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7 % (5.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.4 % (12.46 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2 % (36.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.2 % (6.53 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 13.9 / 15.3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.9 % (11.54 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
55.6 % (19.15 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7 % (15.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved