Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare
Compare
CHARLOTTE HARBOR HEALTHCARE | VS | All other Nursing Homes USA |
Staff Information | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Residents |
171 (79.62 higher than average)
|
vs |
91.38
|
||
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.7 (0.07 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.77
|
||
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.1 (0.26 higher than average)
|
vs |
0.84
|
||
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day |
1.81 (0.22 higher than average)
|
vs |
1.59
|
||
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.02 (5.47 lower than average)
|
vs |
5.49
|
||
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day |
0.02 (0.08 lower than average)
|
vs |
0.10
|
Environmental Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Many level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment. survey Date: 05/28/2009 date Of Correction: 08/14/2009 |
Resident Rights Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Some level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential. survey Date: 05/28/2009 date Of Correction: 06/19/2009 |
Quality Care Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 10/22/2009 date Of Correction: 11/22/2009 |
Administration Deficiencies | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Deficiency #1 |
Scope: Many level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 05/28/2009 date Of Correction: 07/19/2009 |
Quality Measures Q1 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
18 % (7.09 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.09 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
0.8 % (32.15 % lower than average)
|
vs |
32.95 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
9.1 % (3.48 % lower than average)
|
vs |
12.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.6:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
47.4 % (2.86 % higher than average)
|
vs |
44.54 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
7.5 % (8.13 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.63 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
3.2 % (10.26 % lower than average)
|
vs |
13.46 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
6.7 % (21.68 % lower than average)
|
vs |
28.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
8.8 % (34.88 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.68 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
33.9 % (8.88 % higher than average)
|
vs |
25.02 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
96.6 % (11.96 % higher than average)
|
vs |
84.64 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
98.5 % (14.56 % higher than average)
|
vs |
83.94 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
1.1 % (44.8 % lower than average)
|
vs |
45.90 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
1.6 % (13.92 % lower than average)
|
vs |
15.52 %
|
Quality Measures Q3 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication |
16.9-24 % (8.49 % lower than average)
|
vs |
25.39 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased |
1.1 % (22.6 % lower than average)
|
vs |
23.70 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
14.1 % (equals average)
|
vs |
14.10 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers |
7.5 % (1.72 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.22 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.7:1 % | ||||
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder |
41.4 % (1.98 % lower than average)
|
vs |
43.38 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder |
5.4 % (5.25 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.65 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection |
5.8 % (3.78 % lower than average)
|
vs |
9.58 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms |
9.7 % (10.16 % lower than average)
|
vs |
19.86 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained |
5.8 % (32.73 % lower than average)
|
vs |
38.53 %
|
||
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury |
3 % (7.73 % lower than average)
|
vs |
10.73 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain |
37.1 % (12.34 % higher than average)
|
vs |
24.76 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine |
94.9 % (13.46 % higher than average)
|
vs |
81.44 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened |
97.8 % (23.05 % higher than average)
|
vs |
74.75 %
|
||
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication |
14.1 % (3.24 % lower than average)
|
vs |
17.34 %
|