CHICAGOLAND CHRISTIAN VILLAGE

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	CROWN POINT	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have CROWN POINT
State attribute explanation	IN	vs	3.1% Nursing Homes USA have IN	compare IN Nursing Homes USA
Street	6685 E 117TH AVE
Zip Code	46307
Phone	2196620642
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	146 (37.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (146)
Total Number of Residents	130 (38.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (130)
Percent of Occupied Beds	89 % (5.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (89) %
Health Survey Date	4/17/2012
Fire Survey Date	5/17/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	Non Profit - Church Related	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Church related	compare Non profit - Church related Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	Yes	vs	9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	8 (50.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	10 (46.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	24 (16.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	130 (38.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.47 (0.3 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.03 (0.19 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.50 (0.09 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.08 (5.41 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.08 (0.02 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 03/13/2012 date Of Correction: 03/26/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 12/29/2011 date Of Correction: 01/12/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/28/2011 date Of Correction: 11/22/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading. survey Date: 05/19/2011 date Of Correction: 06/17/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 01/25/2010 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/28/2009 date Of Correction: 12/10/2009

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 02/11/2010 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 02/11/2010 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property. survey Date: 01/25/2010 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 01/25/2010 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves. survey Date: 12/29/2011 date Of Correction: 01/12/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 12/29/2011 date Of Correction: 01/12/2012
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 05/19/2011 date Of Correction: 07/21/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 07/01/2010 date Of Correction: 08/12/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 06/17/2010 date Of Correction: 08/12/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 06/17/2010 date Of Correction: 08/12/2010
Deficiency #7		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 06/17/2010 date Of Correction: 08/12/2010
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 04/22/2010 date Of Correction: 06/17/2010
Deficiency #9		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 09/28/2009 date Of Correction: 12/10/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 07/01/2010 date Of Correction: 08/12/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 04/22/2010 date Of Correction: 08/12/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 07/01/2010 date Of Correction: 08/12/2010
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 01/25/2010 date Of Correction: 02/24/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 09/28/2009 date Of Correction: 11/10/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	25.2 % (0.11 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	4.5 % (28.45 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	9.6 % (7.06 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.5 % (7.08 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	6.4 % (5.43 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	63.4 % (18.86 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.9 % (11.73 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	0.9 % (12.56 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	6.3 % (22.08 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	0.9 % (42.78 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.9-24 % (8.12 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	92.6 % (7.96 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	91.7 % (7.76 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2 (43.9 lower than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	8.1 / 8.8 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	22.2:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	4.6 % (19.1 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	14 % (0.1 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	7.6 % (1.62 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	3.3 % (5.2 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	66.2 % (22.82 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.6 % (6.05 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	2.7 % (6.88 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.4 % (15.46 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.8 % (36.73 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	7 % (3.73 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.7 % (11.06 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	93.4 % (11.96 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	91.6 % (16.85 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	18.6 (65.5) % (1.26 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %