VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CHRISTIAN CARE HOME

CHRISTIAN CARE HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CHRISTIAN CARE HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City FERGUSON   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have FERGUSON
State attribute explanation MO   vs 3.2% Nursing Homes USA have MO
Street 800 CHAMBERS ROAD  
Zip Code 63135  
Phone 3145228100  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
150  (41.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
140  (48.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
93 % (9.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 5/17/2011  
Fire Survey Date 5/17/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Church Related  vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Church related
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(56.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
141  (49.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15  (0.62 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.78  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.92  (0.67 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 08/02/2011
date Of Correction: 09/02/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 06/23/2011
date Of Correction: 09/02/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 05/17/2011
date Of Correction: 09/02/2011 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.
survey Date: 05/27/2010
date Of Correction: 07/23/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 06/23/2011
date Of Correction: 06/26/2011 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 05/17/2011
date Of Correction: 06/09/2011 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Activities To Meet The Interests And Needs Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 05/17/2011
date Of Correction: 06/07/2011 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 07/21/2009
date Of Correction: 08/07/2009 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.6 % (1.49 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.4 % (12.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2 % (10.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.2 % (4.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.3 % (20.24 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.8 % (14.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.6 % (9.86 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.1 % (26.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 13.9 / 15.3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.7 % (1.06 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.7 % (13.76 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
(44.9 lower than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3 % (11.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.3 % (4.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 % (22.8 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3 % (9.8 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4 % (5.22 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8 % (0.5 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.3 % (20.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.9 % (9.75 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.5 % (5.08 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2 % (17.86 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5 % (8.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.9 % (13.86 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
86 % (4.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.9 % (22.15 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5.3 % (12.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved