VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CLAREMONT REHAB & LIVING CTR

CLAREMONT REHAB & LIVING CTR

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CLAREMONT REHAB & LIVING CTR VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BUFFALO GROVE   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BUFFALO GROVE
State attribute explanation IL   vs 5% Nursing Homes USA have IL
Street 150 NORTH WEILAND ROAD  
Zip Code 60089  
Phone 8474650200  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
200  (91.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
173  (81.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
87 % (3.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/17/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/15/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
173  (81.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88  (0.11 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.45  (0.39 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.33  (0.26 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.21  (5.28 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.21  (0.11 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 4
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/11/2012
date Of Correction: 01/31/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/23/2011
date Of Correction: 04/21/2011 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 01/11/2012
date Of Correction: 01/31/2012 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 12/01/2009
date Of Correction: 12/09/2009 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 10/27/2009
date Of Correction: 11/16/2009 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .
survey Date: 08/25/2009
date Of Correction: 09/04/2009 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.
survey Date: 01/11/2012
date Of Correction: 01/31/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Ensure That All Nurse Aids Who Have Worked Less Than 4 Months Are Enrolled In Appropriate Training Or Have Been Deemed Competent To Provide Nursing And Nursing Related Services.
survey Date: 01/11/2012
date Of Correction: 01/31/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25 % (0.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.3 % (32.65 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.9 (55.2) % (3.76 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2 % (10.58 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7 % (4.83 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
54.5 % (9.96 % higher than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.9 % (10.73 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.8 % (12.66 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.8 % (27.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.8 % (42.88 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28 % (2.98 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.2 % (10.44 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
63.6 % (20.34 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 % (29.3 % higher than average)
vs
45.90 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.6 % (13.92 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.6 % (3.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.2 % (23.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.2 % (1.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.7 % (7.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
53.2 % (9.82 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.3 % (6.35 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7 % (6.88 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1 % (18.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.3 % (38.23 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 % (8.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
37.4 % (12.64 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
66 % (15.44 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
35.1 % (39.65 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11 % (6.34 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved