VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CLARK FORK VALLEY NURSING HOME

CLARK FORK VALLEY NURSING HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CLARK FORK VALLEY NURSING HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City PLAINS   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have PLAINS
State attribute explanation MT   vs 0.5% Nursing Homes USA have MT
Street 10 KRUGER RD  
Zip Code 59859  
Phone 4068264800  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(1.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
28  (80.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
24  (67.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
86 % (2.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 7/21/2011  
Fire Survey Date 7/7/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? Yes  vs 6.4% Nursing Homes USA have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(0.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
24  (67.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.07  (0.3 higher than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74  (0.1 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.81  (0.22 higher than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
75.2  (69.71 higher than average)
vs
5.49

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 05/10/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 05/10/2010 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 03/23/2010 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 05/10/2010 

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 05/10/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Check And Assess Each Resident's Assessment At Least Every 3 Months.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 05/10/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Review Or Revise The Resident's Care Plan After Any Major Change In A Resident's Physical Or Mental Health.
survey Date: 01/13/2010
date Of Correction: 05/10/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Quality Measures Q3
Deficiency #3 17.9 (64.2) % 
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.3 % (5.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.7 % (10.6 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.7 % (1.2 % higher than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.3 % (20.08 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.4 % (2.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.9 % (2.68 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
18.6 (65.5) % (1.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
11.1 % (27.43 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 5.6:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved