VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CLYDE W COSPER TEXAS STATE VETERANS HOME

CLYDE W COSPER TEXAS STATE VETERANS HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CLYDE W COSPER TEXAS STATE VETERANS HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City BONHAM   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have BONHAM
State attribute explanation TX   vs 7.6% Nursing Homes USA have TX
Street 1300 SEVEN OAKS RD  
Zip Code 75418  
Phone 9036408387  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
160  (51.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
152  (60.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
95 % (11.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 11/18/2011  
Fire Survey Date 11/17/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies 5  
Staff Information
Number of Residents
152  (60.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.51  (0.26 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.73  (0.11 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.24  (0.35 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (5.45 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04  (0.06 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 02/24/2010
date Of Correction: 03/31/2010 

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 11/18/2010
date Of Correction: 11/19/2010 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 11/18/2010
date Of Correction: 11/19/2010 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 02/24/2010
date Of Correction: 03/31/2010 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 02/24/2010
date Of Correction: 03/31/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.8 % (13.71 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 % (30.45 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.2 % (8.46 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.7 % (2.88 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 8.9 / 9.9 % 
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
43.9 % (0.64 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.8 % (12.83 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7 % (9.76 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.8 % (22.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.1 % (15.92 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
80 % (4.64 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
60.4 % (23.54 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3 % (11.22 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.6 % (8.21 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (22.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.4 % (7.7 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.8 % (0.42 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.7 % (1.8 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.6 % (1.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 % (6.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.20 % (7.38 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.3 % (14.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.2 % (38.33 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.3 % (5.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4 % (19.36 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.1 % (0.34 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
60.7 % (14.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
19.8 % (2.46 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved