VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > COLUMBUS WEST PARK NSG & REHAB

COLUMBUS WEST PARK NSG & REHAB

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
COLUMBUS WEST PARK NSG & REHAB VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Columbus  vs 0.4% Nursing Homes USA have Columbus
State attribute explanation OH   vs 6.2% Nursing Homes USA have OH
Street 1700 HEINZERLING DRIVE  
Zip Code 43223  
Phone 6142744222  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
100  (8.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
90  (1.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
90 % (6.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 7/14/2011  
Fire Survey Date 7/12/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Partnership  vs 7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

Staff Information
Number of Residents
90  (1.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74  (0.03 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.66  (0.18 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.4  (0.19 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (5.46 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.03  (0.07 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.4 % (0.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.4 % (0.26 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.1 % (9.48 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.5 % (1.33 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.4 % (15.14 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 % (13.93 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.5 % (2.96 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
15.8 % (12.58 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.5 % (1.48 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.2 % (8.56 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.3 % (9.36 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 10.3:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 2.6 / 3 % 
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.1 % (0.29 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (51.5 % higher than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.3 % (5.2 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.7 % (7.52 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8 % (1.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
17.9 (64.2) % (25.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2 % (9.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.3 % (3.28 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
15.1 % (4.76 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.1 % (35.43 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5 % (7.23 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.8 % (0.04 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.2 % (12.76 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.1 % (18.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.1 % (14.24 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved