VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CONCORD NURSING HOME INC

CONCORD NURSING HOME INC

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CONCORD NURSING HOME INC VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City Brooklyn  vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have Brooklyn
State attribute explanation NY   vs 4.1% Nursing Homes USA have NY
Street 300 MADISON STREET  
Zip Code 11216  
Phone 7186367500  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
140  (31.06 higher than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
132  (40.75 higher than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
94 % (10.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 10/11/2011  
Fire Survey Date 10/11/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Church Related  vs 4.4% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Church related
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? Yes  vs 31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

Staff Information
Number of Residents
132  (40.62 higher than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.42  (0.35 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.76  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.18  (0.41 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (5.47 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02  (0.08 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 17.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.6 % (31.35 % lower than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3 % (15.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.8 % (4.78 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1 % (6.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.3 % (11.24 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.6 % (15.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.9 % (12.56 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.3 % (40.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.7 % (18.32 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.9 % (7.74 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.5 % (4.44 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 % (59.68 % higher than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.7 % (5.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.1 % (18.6 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain 2.6 / 3 % 
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 13.9 / 15.3 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.8 % (2.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.9 % (12.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.4 % (10.25 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4 % (8.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.3 % (19.56 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3 % (35.53 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.3 % (10.43 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.5 % (19.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.6 % (2.84 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
75.8 % (1.05 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.7 % (10.64 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved