CONESTOGA VIEW | comparical.com

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

CONESTOGA VIEW

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	75.2 %
City	Lancaster	vs	0.2% Nursing Homes USA have Lancaster
State attribute explanation	PA	vs	4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA	compare PA Nursing Homes USA
Street	900 EAST KING STREET
Zip Code	17602
Phone	7172997850
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	446 (337.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (446)
Total Number of Residents	437 (345.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (437)
Percent of Occupied Beds	98 % (14.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (98) %
Health Survey Date	9/30/2011
Fire Survey Date	9/27/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Partnership	vs	7.9% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Partnership	compare For profit - Partnership Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	No	vs	68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	16 (8.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	437 (345.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.44 (0.33 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.03 (0.19 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.47 (0.12 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.05 (5.44 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.05 (0.05 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment. survey Date: 05/14/2010 date Of Correction: 06/16/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Each Resident In A Way That Keeps Or Builds The Resident's Quality Of Life. survey Date: 09/30/2011 date Of Correction: 11/23/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 04/22/2011 date Of Correction: 05/23/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 04/26/2012 date Of Correction: 05/28/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 11/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/23/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 01/21/2011 date Of Correction: 03/01/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Or Get Specialized Rehabilitative Services Per The Patient's Assessment Or Plan Of Care. survey Date: 08/23/2010 date Of Correction: 09/20/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 06/11/2010 date Of Correction: 06/30/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 05/14/2010 date Of Correction: 06/16/2010
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 01/21/2010 date Of Correction: 02/26/2010
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 07/30/2009 date Of Correction: 08/24/2009

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 09/30/2011 date Of Correction: 11/23/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional. survey Date: 05/14/2010 date Of Correction: 06/16/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 01/10/2011 date Of Correction: 02/22/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 01/21/2010 date Of Correction: 02/26/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 09/11/2009 date Of Correction: 10/05/2009

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	29.5 % (4.41 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.6 % (32.35 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.6:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	6.6 % (5.23 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	48.7 % (4.16 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.3 % (11.33 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6.5 % (6.96 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	5.5 % (22.88 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1 % (42.68 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	29.4 % (4.38 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	83.7 % (0.94 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	77.4 % (6.54 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	1.3 % (44.6 % lower than average)	vs	45.90 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4.5 % (11.02 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	31.9 % (6.51 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.3 % (22.4 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	15.9:1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	5.1 % (4.12 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	5.4 % (3.1 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	49.4 % (6.02 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.8 % (5.85 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.7 % (3.88 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.2 % (15.66 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.6 % (36.93 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4.5 % (6.23 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	30.9 % (6.14 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	58.6 % (22.84 % lower than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	69.2 % (5.55 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	17.2 % (0.14 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %