VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CONNER-WILLIAMS NURSING HOME

CONNER-WILLIAMS NURSING HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CONNER-WILLIAMS NURSING HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City RIDLEY PARK   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have RIDLEY PARK
State attribute explanation PA   vs 4.5% Nursing Homes USA have PA
Street 105 MORTON AVENUE  
Zip Code 19078  
Phone 6105211331  
Overall Star Rating
(0.89 higher than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(2.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(2.31 lower than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
50  (58.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
42  (49.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
84 % (0.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 2/7/2012  
Fire Survey Date 2/15/2012  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(6.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
42  (49.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.67  (0.1 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.66  (0.18 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.34  (0.25 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 03/11/2010
date Of Correction: 04/16/2010 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25 % (0.09 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
15.6 % (3.02 % higher than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.1 % (4.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.5 % (11.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14.3 % (0.84 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.1 % (21.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.3 % (41.38 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7 % (8.52 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.7 (74.7) % (1.69 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.5 % (17.4 % higher than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers 18.1:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.8 % (3.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
59.6 % (16.22 % higher than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 % (6.45 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
12.7 % (3.12 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 9.9:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.4 % (36.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 21.2:1 % 


Scroll To Top

saved