CONSULATE HEALTH CARE OF BRANDON

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	Brandon	vs	0% Nursing Homes USA have Brandon
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	701 VICTORIA ST
Zip Code	33510
Phone	8136814220
Overall Star Rating	5 (1.89 higher than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (5)
Health Inspections Star Rating	3 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (3)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (4)
Quality Measures Star Rating	5 (1.69 higher than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (5)
RN Only Star Rating	4 (0.83 higher than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (4)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	115 (23.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (115)
Percent of Occupied Beds	96 % (12.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (96) %
Health Survey Date	5/4/2012
Fire Survey Date	5/4/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	15

Staff Information
Number of Residents	115 (23.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.85 (0.08 higher than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.12 (0.28 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.97 (0.38 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.14 (5.35 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.14 (0.04 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 02/14/2011 date Of Correction: 03/14/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident. survey Date: 07/01/2009 date Of Correction: 08/01/2009
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Establish And Follow A Written Policy That Permits A Resident To Return To The Nursing Home After Hospitalization. survey Date: 04/20/2009 date Of Correction: 05/20/2009
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Tell The Resident Or The Resident's Representative In Writing How Long The Nursing Home Will Hold The Resident's Bed. survey Date: 04/20/2009 date Of Correction: 05/20/2009
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 04/20/2009 date Of Correction: 05/20/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged. survey Date: 04/20/2009 date Of Correction: 05/20/2009

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 04/08/2011 date Of Correction: 05/08/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 04/08/2011 date Of Correction: 05/08/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 01/05/2010 date Of Correction: 02/05/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 01/05/2010 date Of Correction: 02/05/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident . survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/01/2009
Deficiency #6		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 07/14/2009 date Of Correction: 08/01/2009
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 07/01/2009 date Of Correction: 08/01/2009

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 02/14/2011 date Of Correction: 03/14/2011

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards. survey Date: 04/08/2011 date Of Correction: 05/08/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	15.1 % (9.99 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1 % (31.95 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.3 % (6.28 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	16.3:1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.1 % (14.53 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	6.5 % (6.96 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	29 % (0.62 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.20 % (41.48 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	27.1 % (2.08 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	88.2 % (3.56 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	90.3 % (6.36 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	1.1 % (14.42 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	14.3 % (11.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	0.8 % (22.9 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	1.1 % (13 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	4.1 % (5.12 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	13.5 % (5 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	37 % (6.38 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	1.50 % (9.15 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	5.2 % (4.38 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	21.4 % (1.54 % higher than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	1.6 % (36.93 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	0.8 % (9.93 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	18.5 % (6.26 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	85.4 % (3.96 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	89.6 % (14.85 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2.3 % (15.04 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %