CONSULATE HEALTH CARE OF LAKE PARKER

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	LAKELAND	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have LAKELAND
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	2020 W LAKE PARKER DR
Zip Code	33805
Phone	8636827580
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (2)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (1)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	119 (27.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (119)
Percent of Occupied Beds	99 % (15.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (99) %
Health Survey Date	5/19/2011
Fire Survey Date	5/17/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	Yes	vs	54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	1 (57.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	1 (55.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	14

Staff Information
Number of Residents	112 (20.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.46 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.91 (0.07 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.37 (0.22 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.27 (5.22 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.27 (0.17 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 03/19/2012 date Of Correction: 04/09/2012
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 10/20/2011 date Of Correction: 11/04/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 06/07/2011 date Of Correction: 06/19/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration. survey Date: 10/20/2011 date Of Correction: 11/04/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So. survey Date: 10/20/2011 date Of Correction: 11/04/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 09/07/2011 date Of Correction: 11/04/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 06/07/2011 date Of Correction: 06/19/2011
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses. survey Date: 05/19/2011 date Of Correction: 06/19/2011

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured. survey Date: 09/07/2011 date Of Correction: 10/07/2011

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards. survey Date: 01/26/2012 date Of Correction: 02/10/2012

Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist. survey Date: 09/07/2011 date Of Correction: 10/07/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 09/07/2011 date Of Correction: 10/07/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors. survey Date: 06/07/2011 date Of Correction: 06/19/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being. survey Date: 06/07/2011 date Of Correction: 06/19/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	25 % (0.09 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.7 % (31.25 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	14.8 % (1.86 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	9.7 % (2.88 % lower than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	4.7 % (7.13 % lower than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	33.3 % (11.24 % lower than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.4 % (11.23 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	8.1 / 8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	4.6 % (23.78 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	4.6 % (39.08 % lower than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	20.9 % (4.12 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	95.6 % (10.96 % higher than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	96.6 % (12.66 % higher than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.4 % (12.12 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	25.1 % (0.29 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	2.1 % (21.6 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	16.6 % (2.5 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	6.9 % (2.32 % lower than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	2.5 % (6 % lower than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	31.8 % (11.58 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.5 % (7.15 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	4.5 % (5.08 % lower than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	3.2 % (16.66 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	4 % (34.53 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	4.8 % (5.93 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	22.4:1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	97.6 % (16.16 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	98.2 % (23.45 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	1.50 % (15.84 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %