CORAL BAY HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	WEST PALM BEACH	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have WEST PALM BEACH
State attribute explanation	FL	vs	4.4% Nursing Homes USA have FL	compare FL Nursing Homes USA
Street	2939 SOUTH HAVERHILL ROAD
Zip Code	33415
Phone	5616413130
Overall Star Rating	2 (1.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (2)
Health Inspections Star Rating	2 (0.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (2)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	3 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (3)
Quality Measures Star Rating	3 (0.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (3)
RN Only Star Rating	2 (1.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (2)
Number of Certified Beds	120 (11.06 higher than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (120)
Total Number of Residents	108 (16.75 higher than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (108)
Percent of Occupied Beds	90 % (6.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (90) %
Health Survey Date	10/20/2011
Fire Survey Date	10/20/2011
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Corporation	vs	56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation	compare For profit - Corporation Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	Both	vs	29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	75.2 (17.04 higher than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	75.2 (18.89 higher than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	6

Staff Information
Number of Residents	108 (16.62 higher than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.64 (0.13 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.15 (0.31 higher than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	1.79 (0.2 higher than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.21 (5.28 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.21 (0.11 higher than average)	vs	0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents. survey Date: 07/23/2010 date Of Correction: 08/06/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident. survey Date: 03/21/2011 date Of Correction: 04/20/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged. survey Date: 03/21/2011 date Of Correction: 04/20/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Notify The Resident Or Provide Reasons For A Transfer Or Discharge. survey Date: 03/21/2011 date Of Correction: 04/20/2011

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality. survey Date: 01/12/2010 date Of Correction: 02/12/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Many level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 03/21/2011 date Of Correction: 04/20/2011

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	18.5 % (6.59 % lower than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.6 % (31.35 % lower than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	8.7 % (7.96 % lower than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	15 % (2.42 % higher than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	13.8 % (1.97 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	50 % (5.46 % higher than average)	vs	44.54 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.8 % (12.83 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	13.8 % (0.34 % higher than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)	vs	43.68 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	7.6 % (17.42 % lower than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	75.1 % (9.54 % lower than average)	vs	84.64 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	75.4 % (8.54 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	75.2 (29.3 higher than average)	vs	45.90
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	2.5 % (13.02 % lower than average)	vs	15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	16.2 % (9.19 % lower than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.6 % (22.1 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	9.5 % (4.6 % lower than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	16.2 % (6.98 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	9.9:1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	50.4 % (7.02 % higher than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	4.2 % (6.45 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	13.2 % (3.62 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.3 % (18.56 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	3.3 % (7.43 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	13.7 % (11.06 % lower than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	85.4 % (3.96 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	83.6 % (8.85 % higher than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	18.9 % (1.56 % higher than average)	vs	17.34 %