VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CORTLAND PLACE

CORTLAND PLACE

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CORTLAND PLACE VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City GREENVILLE   vs 0.3% Nursing Homes USA have GREENVILLE
State attribute explanation RI   vs 0.5% Nursing Homes USA have RI
Street 20 AUSTIN AVENUE  
Zip Code 2828  
Phone 4019493880  
Overall Star Rating
(2.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(1.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
80  (28.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
78  (13.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
98 % (14.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 12/1/2011  
Fire Survey Date 12/1/2011  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils Both  vs 29.8% Nursing Homes USA have Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? Yes  vs 1% Nursing Homes USA have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(55.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(53.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
14  (6.52 higher than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
77  (14.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.65  (0.12 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.42  (0.42 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.07  (0.52 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (5.35 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14  (0.04 higher than average)
vs
0.10

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 12/01/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.
survey Date: 11/27/2009
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.
survey Date: 08/17/2009
date Of Correction: 09/03/2009 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.
survey Date: 08/17/2009
date Of Correction: 09/03/2009 

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.
survey Date: 12/01/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Has The Right To Have A Choice Over Activities, Their Schedules And Health Care According To His Or Her Interests, Assessment, And Plan Of Care.
survey Date: 08/10/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Give The Resident The Right To Receive Visitors.
survey Date: 08/10/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Each Resident's Personal And Medical Records Private And Confidential.
survey Date: 08/10/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Deficiency #5 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Honor All Of The Resident's Rights As A Resident Of The Nursing Home, Free Of Coercion And Reprisal, And As A Citizen Or Resident Of The United States.
survey Date: 08/10/2010
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 04/18/2012 

Deficiency #2 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 04/18/2012 

Deficiency #3 Scope: Some
level Of Harm: 3
deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 04/18/2012 

Deficiency #4 Scope: Many
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.
survey Date: 12/01/2011
date Of Correction: Not Available 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.
survey Date: 03/30/2012
date Of Correction: 04/18/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.1 % (1.99 % lower than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.3 % (10.36 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.4 % (10.18 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.2 % (5.63 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6 % (14.03 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 18.2:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.1 % (14.28 % lower than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.4 % (13.62 % lower than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.2 % (16.44 % lower than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
64.8 % (19.14 % lower than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.5 % (11.02 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.5 % (2.89 % lower than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 % (22.7 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.3 % (8.8 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5 % (6.72 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.8 % (2.7 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.8 % (1.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.1 % (9.55 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
16 % (6.42 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13.2 % (6.66 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.5 - 2.0 % (38.03 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.1 % (5.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.5-24 % (5.26 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.8 % (22.64 % lower than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
50.7 % (24.05 % lower than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
26 % (8.66 % higher than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved