VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > COTTINGHAM RETIREMENT COMMUNITY

COTTINGHAM RETIREMENT COMMUNITY

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
COTTINGHAM RETIREMENT COMMUNITY VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CINCINNATI   vs 0.4% Nursing Homes USA have CINCINNATI
State attribute explanation OH   vs 6.2% Nursing Homes USA have OH
Street 3995 COTTINGHAM DRIVE  
Zip Code 45241  
Phone 5135633600  
Overall Star Rating
(0.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.17 higher than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(0.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(0.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(0.83 higher than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
60  (48.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
54  (37.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
90 % (6.35 % higher than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 4/4/2012  
Fire Survey Date 4/2/2012  
Sprinkler Status Fully Sprinklered  vs 90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership Non Profit - Corporation  vs 18.7% Nursing Homes USA have Non profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? Yes  vs 54.9% Nursing Homes USA have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? Yes  vs 9.1% Nursing Homes USA have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
(57.16 lower than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
(55.31 lower than average)
vs
56.31

Staff Information
Number of Residents
54  (37.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.63  (0.14 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.95  (0.11 higher than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.58  (0.01 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (5.43 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06  (0.04 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.6 % (3.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)
vs
32.95 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.6 % (2.06 % lower than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.5 % (5.08 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1 % (7.73 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 % (59.57 % higher than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14.3 % (0.84 % higher than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 % (46.82 % higher than average)
vs
28.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (31.52 % higher than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.7 % (0.68 % higher than average)
vs
25.02 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (15.36 % higher than average)
vs
84.64 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 % (16.06 % higher than average)
vs
83.94 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1 % (11.42 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.7 % (2.31 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 % (22.5 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.9 % (3.2 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2 % (6.02 % lower than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.4 % (2.1 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.8 % (6.58 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.7 % (9.95 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.5 % (1.92 % higher than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6 % (19.26 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 % (36.67 % higher than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7 % (3.73 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.1 % (3.66 % lower than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.1 % (16.66 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.1 % (22.35 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 8.9 / 9.9 % 


Scroll To Top

saved