COURTYARD MANOR NURSE CARE CENTER & ASSISTED LIV

Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
Compare

All other Nursing Homes USA

General
City	LAFAYETTE	vs	0.1% Nursing Homes USA have LAFAYETTE
State attribute explanation	LA	vs	1.8% Nursing Homes USA have LA	compare LA Nursing Homes USA
Street	306 SYDNEY MARTIN ROAD
Zip Code	70507
Phone	3372373940
Overall Star Rating	1 (2.11 lower than average)	vs	3.11	Compare similar Overall Star Rating (1)
Health Inspections Star Rating	1 (1.83 lower than average)	vs	2.83	Compare similar Health Inspections Star Rating (1)
Nurse Staffing Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar Nurse Staffing Star Rating (1)
Quality Measures Star Rating	1 (2.31 lower than average)	vs	3.31	Compare similar Quality Measures Star Rating (1)
RN Only Star Rating	1 (2.17 lower than average)	vs	3.17	Compare similar RN Only Star Rating (1)
Number of Certified Beds	92 (16.94 lower than average)	vs	108.94	Compare similar Number of Certified Beds (92)
Total Number of Residents	89 (2.25 lower than average)	vs	91.25	Compare similar Total Number of Residents (89)
Percent of Occupied Beds	97 % (13.35 % higher than average)	vs	83.65 %	Compare similar Percent of Occupied Beds (97) %
Health Survey Date	2/10/2012
Fire Survey Date	2/7/2012
Sprinkler Status	Fully Sprinklered	vs	90.2% Nursing Homes USA have Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation	Medicare And Medicaid	vs	91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid	compare Medicare and Medicaid Nursing Homes USA
Type of Ownership	For Profit - Individual	vs	3.5% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Individual	compare For profit - Individual Nursing Homes USA
Located Within a Hospital?	No	vs	93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?	Compare similar don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?	No	vs	45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils	RESIDENT	vs	66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community?	No	vs	90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey?	Yes	vs	31.3% Nursing Homes USA have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility?	No	vs	99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count	2 (56.16 lower than average)	vs	58.16
Total Enforcement Actions Count	4 (52.31 lower than average)	vs	56.31
# of deficiencies	27 (19.52 higher than average)	vs	7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents	89 (2.38 lower than average)	vs	91.38
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.29 (0.48 lower than average)	vs	0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.67 (0.17 lower than average)	vs	0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.96 (0.63 lower than average)	vs	1.59
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.06 (5.43 lower than average)	vs	5.49
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day	0.06 (0.04 lower than average)	vs	0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 4 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/23/2011 date Of Correction: 10/24/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment. survey Date: 09/23/2011 date Of Correction: 10/24/2011
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 3 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/03/2011 date Of Correction: 09/28/2011
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 10/28/2010 date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Dispose Of Garbage And Refuse Properly. survey Date: 09/02/2010 date Of Correction: 09/28/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 09/02/2010 date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
Deficiency #7		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 08/05/2010 date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
Deficiency #8		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents. survey Date: 01/19/2010 date Of Correction: 03/05/2010
Deficiency #9		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Provide A Safe, Clean, Comfortable And Homelike Environment. survey Date: 08/11/2009 date Of Correction: Not Available

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment. survey Date: 08/05/2010 date Of Correction: 09/19/2010

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Listen To The Resident Or Family Groups Or Act On Their Complaints Or Suggestions. survey Date: 04/21/2011 date Of Correction: Not Available
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 10/28/2010 date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality. survey Date: 08/05/2010 date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident. survey Date: 08/05/2010 date Of Correction: 12/17/2010

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being. survey Date: 08/03/2011 date Of Correction: 09/28/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 09/02/2010 date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores. survey Date: 08/05/2010 date Of Correction: 09/19/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 08/05/2010 date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care. survey Date: 01/19/2010 date Of Correction: 03/05/2010

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan. survey Date: 09/23/2011 date Of Correction: 10/24/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity. survey Date: 08/05/2010 date Of Correction: 09/19/2010

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 09/23/2011 date Of Correction: 10/24/2011
Deficiency #2		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 09/02/2010 date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
Deficiency #3		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 09/02/2010 date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
Deficiency #4		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action. survey Date: 08/05/2010 date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
Deficiency #5		Scope: Few level Of Harm: 2 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 08/05/2010 date Of Correction: 12/17/2010
Deficiency #6		Scope: Some level Of Harm: 1 deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards. survey Date: 06/16/2010 date Of Correction: Not Available

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	28.2 % (3.11 % higher than average)	vs	25.09 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	75.2 % (42.25 % higher than average)	vs	32.95 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	20.5 % (3.84 % higher than average)	vs	16.66 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	20.6 % (8.02 % higher than average)	vs	12.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	14.5 % (2.67 % higher than average)	vs	11.83 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	2.5 % (13.13 % lower than average)	vs	15.63 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	13.2 % (0.26 % lower than average)	vs	13.46 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	1.3 % (27.08 % lower than average)	vs	28.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	2.6 / 3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	33.3 % (8.28 % higher than average)	vs	25.02 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	29.4 % (54.54 % lower than average)	vs	83.94 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	7.9:1 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication	31.4 (88.5) % (6.01 % higher than average)	vs	25.39 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased	1.50 % (22.2 % lower than average)	vs	23.70 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	27.5 % (13.4 % higher than average)	vs	14.10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers	18.8 % (9.58 % higher than average)	vs	9.22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight	14.6 % (6.1 % higher than average)	vs	8.50 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder	13.7 % (29.68 % lower than average)	vs	43.38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder	3.7 % (6.95 % lower than average)	vs	10.65 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection	16.7 % (7.12 % higher than average)	vs	9.58 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms	2.1 % (17.76 % lower than average)	vs	19.86 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained	3.8 % (34.73 % lower than average)	vs	38.53 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury	7.6 % (3.13 % lower than average)	vs	10.73 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain	27.3 % (2.54 % higher than average)	vs	24.76 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine	87.1 % (5.66 % higher than average)	vs	81.44 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened	21.8 % (52.95 % lower than average)	vs	74.75 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication	2.4 % (14.94 % lower than average)	vs	17.34 %