VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > CRANFORD HALL NURSING HOME

CRANFORD HALL NURSING HOME

Details Rankings Comparisons Related
Compare with other Nursing Homes USA
 Compare
CRANFORD HALL NURSING HOME VS
All other Nursing Homes USA
General
City CRANFORD   vs 0% Nursing Homes USA have CRANFORD
State attribute explanation NJ   vs 2.4% Nursing Homes USA have NJ
Street 600 LINCOLN PARK EAST  
Zip Code 7016  
Phone 9082767100  
Overall Star Rating
(1.11 lower than average)
vs
3.11

Health Inspections Star Rating
(0.83 lower than average)
vs
2.83

Nurse Staffing Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Quality Measures Star Rating
(1.69 higher than average)
vs
3.31

RN Only Star Rating
(2.17 lower than average)
vs
3.17

Number of Certified Beds
100  (8.94 lower than average)
vs
108.94

Total Number of Residents
73  (18.25 lower than average)
vs
91.25

Percent of Occupied Beds
73 % (10.65 % lower than average)
vs
83.65 %

Health Survey Date 9/12/2011  
Fire Survey Date 9/12/2011  
Sprinkler Status Partially Sprinklered  vs 8.5% Nursing Homes USA have Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation Medicare And Medicaid  vs 91.5% Nursing Homes USA have Medicare and Medicaid
Type of Ownership For Profit - Corporation  vs 56.7% Nursing Homes USA have For profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital? No  vs 93.6% Nursing Homes USA don't have Located Within a Hospital?
Multi Nursing Home Ownership? No  vs 45.1% Nursing Homes USA don't have Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Resident and Family Councils RESIDENT   vs 66% Nursing Homes USA have RESIDENT
Continuing Care Retirement Community? No  vs 90.9% Nursing Homes USA don't have Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Quality Indicator Survey? No  vs 68.7% Nursing Homes USA don't have Quality Indicator Survey?
Special Focus Facility? No  vs 99% Nursing Homes USA don't have Special Focus Facility?
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2  (17.04 higher than average)
vs
58.16

Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2  (18.89 higher than average)
vs
56.31

# of deficiencies
(5.48 lower than average)
vs
7.48

Staff Information
Number of Residents
73  (18.38 lower than average)
vs
91.38

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.25  (0.52 lower than average)
vs
0.77

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.61  (0.23 lower than average)
vs
0.84

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.86  (0.73 lower than average)
vs
1.59

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (5.41 lower than average)
vs
5.49

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08  (0.02 lower than average)
vs
0.10

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.
survey Date: 12/02/2011
date Of Correction: 01/25/2012 

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1 Scope: Few
level Of Harm: 2
deficiency: 1) Set Up A Group That Is Legally Responsible For Writing And Setting Up Policies For Leading And Running The Nursing Home; Or 2) Hire A Properly Licensed Administrator.
survey Date: 12/02/2011
date Of Correction: 01/25/2012 

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.6 % (3.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.09 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (58.54 % higher than average)
vs
16.66 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.3 % (4.28 % lower than average)
vs
12.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3 % (5.53 % lower than average)
vs
11.83 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.9 % (21.64 % lower than average)
vs
44.54 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 % (13.13 % lower than average)
vs
15.63 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3 % (9.16 % lower than average)
vs
13.46 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 11.6:1 % 
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 % (42.28 % lower than average)
vs
43.68 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2  (29.3 higher than average)
vs
45.90

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4 % (14.12 % lower than average)
vs
15.52 %

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.9 % (0.51 % higher than average)
vs
25.39 %

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7 % (22 % lower than average)
vs
23.70 %

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2 % (12.9 % lower than average)
vs
14.10 %

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12 % (2.78 % higher than average)
vs
9.22 %

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.2 % (0.3 % lower than average)
vs
8.50 %

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.9 % (21.48 % lower than average)
vs
43.38 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.6 % (9.05 % lower than average)
vs
10.65 %

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4 % (7.18 % lower than average)
vs
9.58 %

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.5 % (11.36 % lower than average)
vs
19.86 %

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.4 % (37.13 % lower than average)
vs
38.53 %

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.1 % (3.63 % lower than average)
vs
10.73 %

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 % (50.44 % higher than average)
vs
24.76 %

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 % (18.56 % higher than average)
vs
81.44 %

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.3 % (19.55 % higher than average)
vs
74.75 %

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
14.3 % (3.04 % lower than average)
vs
17.34 %



Scroll To Top

saved